HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
VISIBER SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
PENTADBIR TANAH DAERAH PETALING & ANOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. immediate cancellation of registrar's caveat requested. (Para 1 , 3 , 5 , 8) |
| 2. contentions of parties regarding caveat. (Para 2 , 19 , 20 , 30) |
| 3. plaintiff's acquisition of kayu ara land. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 18) |
| 4. court's analysis of caveat's legitimacy. (Para 40 , 41 , 44) |
| 5. court dismissed plaintiff's application. (Para 50) |
Introduction
[1] At the core of the Plaintiff's application in encl 1 lies a principal request. The relief sought is the immediate withdrawal and cancellation of the Registrar's Caveat. In addition, the Plaintiff seeks further reliefs specifically directed against the Second Defendant.
[2] The submissions exchanged between the parties reveal a striking feature, that is, each side accuses the other of resorting to a 'backdoor approach' in pursuit of their respective objectives. These allegations underscore the contentious and tactical nature of the proceedings.
The Key Issues
[3] The principal issues are:
First, whether the Plaintiff is entitled to have the Registrar's Caveat withdrawn and cancelled; and
Second, whether the Plaintiff is entitled to general, exemplary and injunctive reliefs against the Second Defendant.
[4] In det
Secure Plantations Sdn Bhd v. Pejabat Tanah dan Galian Negeri Pulau Pinang & Ors
Development & Commercial Bank Bhd v. Land Administrator Wilayah Persekutuan & Anor
Tan Soo Bing & Ors v. Tan Kooi Fook
Malayan Banking Bhd v. Pendaftar Hakmilik Negeri Pahang & Anor
Sambaga Valli KR Ponnusamy v. Datuk Bandar Kuala Lumpur & Ors And Another Appeal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.