Back
COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
ANDREW HENG & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
CHONG KOK WOOI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction and factual background of the case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 2. court's observations on unfair fee. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. arguments presented by the defendants. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 4. issues to be determined in the appeal. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 5. analysis of liquidator's powers and requirements. (Para 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 6. clarification of ratio decidendi requirement. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 7. reaffirmation of requirement for court leave. (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43) |
| 8. discussion on leave requirements concerning defendants. (Para 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49) |
| 9. final decision d concluded order. (Para 50) |
Introduction
[1] This is an appeal by Mr Andrew Heng (the 1st appellant/1st defendant in the High Court) who is the liquidator of Masmeyer Development Sdn Bhd, (the 2nd appellant/2nd defendant in the Court below) against the decision of the learned High Court Judge (HCJ) dated 7 November 2023 in allowing the respondent's (the plaintiff in the Court below) application made by way of an Originating Summons dated 30 March 2023 (the OS), challenging the 1st def
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
