Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
CHAN SEI YONG & ORS – Appellant
Versus
MENTERI KESEJAHTERAAN BANDAR PERUMAHAN DAN KERAJAAN TEMPATAN & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. judicial review application regarding extensions of time. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 8 , 18) |
| 2. arguments regarding the legality and implications of extensions. (Para 4 , 19 , 20 , 32 , 35) |
| 3. timeframes established in spas and legislative context. (Para 6 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 17) |
| 4. court's observations on legislative intervention. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 29) |
| 5. court's analysis on prospective overruling and its effects. (Para 22 , 24 , 27 , 28 , 33) |
| 6. final decision dismissing the judicial review application. (Para 34) |
Introduction
[1] The applicants are purchasers of parcels in a residential project known as Amani Residence located at Persiaran Puteri, Taman Puchong Hartamas, Puchong. The 3rd respondent, JKI Development Sdn Bhd, is the developer of the Project ("the developer"). The purchasers had entered into a sale and purchase agreement ("SPA") with the developer for their respective parcels.
[2] The 1st respondent is the Minister of the Ministry of Housing and Local Government ("the Minister" and "Ministry" respectively), while the 2nd respondent is the Controller of Housing in the said Ministry ("the Controller")
[3] On 1 March 2023, the purchas
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
