COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
LIM GUAN ENG – Appellant
Versus
DATUK TAN TEIK CHENG & ANOR – Respondent
Introduction
[1] YB Lim Guan Eng, the Plaintiff (appellant), brought an action against the Defendants (respondents) in relation to the publication of statements which are said to be defamatory against him.
[2] The statements were made by Datuk Tan Teik Cheng (the 1st respondent) and thereafter published in the online version of a leading English daily, which Star Media Group Berhad (the 2nd respondent) owns, i.e., The Star Online.
[3] To succeed in his claim for defamation, the appellant has to prove three elements as follows:
(i) The words are defamatory;
(ii) It referred to him; and
(iii) It was published, that is, communicated to a third party.
(See: Mkini Dotcom Sdn Bhd & Ors v. Raub Australian Gold Mining Sdn Bhd 2021 MarsdenLR 432; ; (Mkini Dotcom); Ayob Saud v. TS Sambanthamurthi 1988 MarsdenLR 69; 1989 MarsdenLR 941 ; [1989] 1 CLJ (Rep) 321 ; Kian Lup Construction v. Hongkong Bank Malaysia Bhd 2002 MarsdenLR 1143; ; 2002 MarsdenLR 1876 ; ).
[4] Based on the facts presented before us, we are of the view that the respondents did not dispute that the statements refer to the appellant and that they were published to a third party. Thus, th
Mkini Dotcom Sdn Bhd & Ors v. Raub Australian Gold Mining Sdn Bhd
Ayob Saud v. TS Sambanthamurthi
Kian Lup Construction v. Hongkong Bank Malaysia Bhd
Chok Foo Choo v. The China Press Bhd
Lim Guan Eng v. Ruslan Kassim & Another Appeal
Chong Chieng Jen v. Government of State of Sarawak & Anor
Dato' Sri Dr Mohamad Salleh Ismail & Anor v. Mohd Rafizi Ramli
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.