Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA PENANG
TYE WAN OON & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
LOH BAN HOCK & ORS (ENCLS 7 & 9) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for interim preservation order. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. details of the consent judgment and parties involved. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. background and initial claims regarding the subject land. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. arguments centered on the grounds for setting aside the judgment. (Para 24 , 27 , 28 , 61) |
| 5. res judicata and its implications on current action. (Para 36 , 45 , 53) |
| 6. arguments regarding the applicability of section 9 in the context. (Para 60 , 70 , 71) |
| 7. final decision and costs ordered. (Para 80) |
Introduction
[1] The Plaintiffs filed a notice of application dated 23 August 2024 vide Enclosure 7 for an interim preservation order to preserve the status quo of the subject land pending the disposal of this suit. Enclosure 7 is made under s 25(2) of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964 and O 29 r 2 of the Rules of Court 2012.
[2] The 2nd and 3th Defendants (collectively the "relevant Defendants") in turn filed a notice of application dated 3 September 2024 vide Enclosure 9 to strike out the Plaintiffs' suit against them. Enclosure 9 is made under O 18 r 19 (1) (a), (b), (c) or (d) of the Rules of Court 2012.
[3] The 1st Defendant
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
