Back
FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
FIVE STAR HERITAGE SDN BHD & ORS – Appellant
Versus
PEGUAM NEGARA MALAYSIA & OTHER APPEALS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. interpretation of attorney general's consent (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. background facts of trust and proceedings (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. high court decisions on os 1128 (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. court of appeal's decisions and reasoning (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 5. role of attorney general in public trusts (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 6. mandatory requirements under s 9 of act 359 (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 7. invalidity of ag's consent and retroactivity (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 8. lack of ag's consent for previous orders (Para 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55) |
| 9. final decision on appeals (Para 57 , 58 , 59 , 60) |
[1] The central issue in these 4 appeals concerns the interpretation and understanding of the Attorney General's consent obtained under s 9 of the Government Proceedings Act 1956 [Act 359].
[2] Of the four appeals, three appeals arose from the judicial review proceedings [JR proceedings] while the fourth appeal arose from proceedings related to Originating Summons No: 24NCVC-1128-12/2014 [OS 1128]. We heard all four appeals together. After full co
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
