HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
JANWELL SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
TEGUH MAJURIA SDN BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court struck out suit due to non-compliance. (Para 1) |
| 2. appeal against dismissal; grounds for reinstatement. (Para 2 , 10) |
| 3. functus officio principle outlined. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 4. compliance failure equates to abuse of process. (Para 6 , 7 , 9) |
| 5. proper mode to challenge is an appeal. (Para 8 , 11) |
| 6. court preferred lim oh and badiaddin rulings. (Para 12 , 13) |
[1] The Plaintiff's suit was struck out by Order of the Court on 3 October 2023 ("Order") due to non-compliance by the Plaintiff with pre-trial case management directions to file witness statements before 28 August 2023. The Order was made on day 2 of what would have been the trial of the suit. There was a procedural history before the Order that I do not need to go into.
[2] The Plaintiff applied vide encl 149 to set aside the Order dated 3 October 2023 and vide encl 151 to reinstate the suit. I dismissed both applications on 10 December 2024 based on a preliminary objection raised by the Defendant that the Court was functus officio to decide encls 149 and 151. The Plaintiff has appealed.
[3] The appeal raises a straightforward question of whether the proper mode of challenging the dis
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.