Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
LE APPLE BOUTIQUE HOTEL (KLCC) SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
THUM MAY YIN & ANOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ action filed for breach of fiduciary duties. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. 1st defendant’s alleged breaches regarding winding up petition. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. 2nd defendant’s alleged breaches related to her roles. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. defendants’ arguments against breach allegations. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 5. duties of directors under the companies act. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 6. court’s detailed findings on breaches by both defendants. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 7. court's assessment of the 2nd defendant’s actions. (Para 37 , 40 , 44 , 51) |
| 8. final order for judgment against defendants. (Para 54 , 56) |
[1] The Plaintiff, a company, filed this writ action against the 1st Defendant and 2nd Defendant who are directors of the Plaintiff company for breach of fiduciary duties, statutory duties and/or breach of fidelity.
[2] The reliefs sought against both the defendants are pleaded at para 19 of the Plaintiff's Statement of Claim ("SoC") which is produced below:
19. Dengan yang demikian, Plaintif menuntut terhadap Defendan-defendan seperti berikut:
Terhadap Defendan Pertama
(a) satu Deklarasi bahawa Defendan Pertama telah melanggar
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
