SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 MarsdenLR 3444

HIGH COURT MALAYA GEORGETOWN
TEOH KUNG YU – Appellant
Versus
PHILIP CHU EN FU – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Lee Huai ,Respondent Advocate: TF Leow,Leow Min Shiuan

Table of Content
1. background of defamation claim against the defendant (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
2. plaintiff's allegations and arguments on defamation (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. defendant's defense and arguments against defamation claim (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
4. court's reasoning and applicable legal standards (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)
5. final decision of the appeal and order (Para 24)
JUDGMENT

Rozana Ali Yusoff J:

A. Introduction

[1] This is an appeal by the Appellant/Plaintiff against the whole decision of the learned Sessions Court Judge (SCJ) after a full trial in dismissing the Appellant/Plaintiff's claim against the Respondent/Defendant for defamation with cost.

[2] For ease of reference, the parties will be referred to as Plaintiff and Defendant respectively.

B. Background Of The Case

[3] The Plaintiff and the Defendant worked in a company registered as Intel Microelectronics (M) Sdn Bhd (Intel) during the period from 2005 to July 2011. The Defendant had applied to be transferred out from the supervision of the Plaintiff and report under another manager before he left the company in 2011. Since the Defendant was urged by the company's Human Resource Dept (HR) as t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top