Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
TAN MEI LI & ORS – Appellant
Versus
BLUEFIRE DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD & ANOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. ex parte leave procedure and factual background (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. arguments of 2nd defendant against ex parte order (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. plaintiffs' arguments supporting the ex parte order (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. principles for setting aside ex parte leave in committal (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 5. non-compliance with expert report requirements (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 6. lack of full and frank disclosure in the ex parte application (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 7. no prima facie case established for contempt (Para 32 , 33) |
| 8. impact of trial findings on committal proceedings (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44) |
| 9. academic nature of committal proceedings post-trial (Para 45 , 46) |
| 10. conclusion on application and procedural integrity (Para 48) |
[1] This was the 2nd Defendant's application dated 1 December 2015 (encl 181) filed pursuant to O 42 r 13 of the Rules of Court 2012 to set aside the ex parte leave order dated 4 November 2015 granting the plaintiffs leave to commence committal proceedings against the 2nd Defendant ("this Application").
[2] This Application was only heard in April
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
