Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
ZHONG E SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
FLOWCRETE MALAYSIA SDN BHD & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of obligations under the guarantee (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 2. plaintiff claims based on invoices and guarantees (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 3. defendant's argument on sham transactions (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 4. legal standards of burden of proof (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 5. court's duty to assess genuine transactions (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 6. evaluation of defenses against plaintiff's claims (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46) |
| 7. evaluation of plaintiff's evidence against defenses (Para 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57) |
| 8. issues with the nature of interest charges (Para 58 , 59 , 60) |
| 9. summary of findings on transaction genuineness (Para 61) |
| 10. legal consequences of finding unlicensed moneylending (Para 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70) |
| 11. conclusion and dismissal of plaintiff's case (Para 71) |
Introduction
[1] The Plaintiffs suit against the 4th and 5th Defendants is premised on a guarantee executed by them to pay all sums due and owing for goods delivered to the 1st Defendant.
Salient Facts
[2] The 1st Defendant, Fl
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
