Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
BIOENERGY FORCE SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
SANTHIRA SEGARAN IYNAN & ANOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. jurisdiction for extending time in judicial review. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. outcome and costs related to the dismissed application. (Para 2) |
| 3. parties' arguments regarding appeal delays. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. court's rationale on procedural compliance and time limits. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 5. application of legal principles for granting extensions. (Para 9 , 10) |
(Enclosure 1)
Introduction
[1] In this Originating Summons (OS), the applicant seeks to be granted an abridgement/extension of time (EOT) to file a Judicial Review application against the Industrial Court's decision in Awad No 2087 of 2024, dated 11 October 2023, under O 3 r 5 of the Rules of Court 2012 (RC 2012), including costs and other reliefs.
[2] On 3 April 2025, after considering all the cause papers and the respective written submissions of the parties, I hold that this OS has no merit, and it is dismissed with costs of RM5,000.00 to be paid within 30 days from the date of this Order.
2.1 Dissatisfied, the applicant has filed this appeal, and my reasons are as follows:
Brief Facts
[3] The 1st respondent (R1) was employed by the applicant's company as of 7 March 2016, as a supervisor in the Thermal O
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
