Introduction

[1] This judgment concerns encl 50, which is the application brought by the first and third defendants (referred to respectively as "D1" and "D3") seeking to set aside the default judgments that were entered against them on 23 August 2024. For D1, the company accused of orchestrating delays, the Court applied the stringent Saudi Eagle test which demanded proof of a defense with real prospect of success. Whereas, for D3, the bankrupt director caught in procedural limbo, the Court applied the more lenient Evans v. Bartlam test requiring only an argua