SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 MarsdenLR 5573

FEDERAL COURT (PUTRAJAYA)
HASNAH MOHAMED HASHIM, CJ, NALLINI PATHMANATHAN, J, RHODZARIAH BUJANG, J
Big Man Management Sdn Bhd – Appellant
Versus
Tenaga Nasional Bhd – Respondent


Table of Content
1. consideration of damages in civil appeals. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. summary of factual background regarding disconnection. (Para 4 , 9)
3. primary legal questions on damages and disconnections. (Para 6 , 10 , 12)
4. assessment of special damages evidence. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
5. exemplary damages considerations. (Para 18 , 21 , 25)
6. reaffirming the standards for proving damages. (Para 30 , 31)
7. criteria for awarding exemplary damages. (Para 46 , 78 , 97)
8. final verdict and orders regarding damages. (Para 131)

[1]The focus of this appeal relates to the assessment and grant of damages generally. The Appellant, Big Man Management Sdn Bhd (‘Big Man’) appeals against the decision of the Court of Appeal which did not award any damages to Big Man despite a clear finding of liability against Tenaga Nasional Berhad (‘TNB’). For the purposes of this appeal, the two heads of damages that arise for consideration are special damages and exemplary damages.

[2]The basis for the Court of Appeal’s decision, in essence, was that Big Man’s claim for special damages was not demonstrated or verified. With respect to exemplary damages the issue related to whether such damages can be award

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top