Back
HIGH COURT (SHAH ALAM)
TEE GEOK HOCK, J
Sivasubramaniam Sivayogarajasingam & Anor – Appellant
Versus
Saumian Sivayogarajasingam & Ors – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for case transfer to facilitate hearing. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. contentions regarding alleged misconduct and relevance of cases. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. interpretation of transfer powers according to case law. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. clarification on limitations of cross-territory transfer. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 36) |
| 5. discussion on necessity of prior consolidation before transfer. (Para 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 6. justification for inter-related suits to be heard together. (Para 61 , 62 , 63) |
| 7. rationale for transferring case to ncvc3 for convenience. (Para 65 , 66 , 67) |
[1]Enclosure 58 is an application by the Plaintiff to transfer the present NCvC10 suit here to Shah Alam High Court NCvC3 so that it can be heard and decided by the same Judge as two other pending suits in NCvC3.
[2]Apart from the two other suits pending in NCvC3 and this NCvC10 suit, there is also another pending suit in NCvC12 which the Plaintiff has applied for transfer to NCvC3 for all of the four suits to be heard and decided by the same Judge.
[3]The Plaintiff here is the father of the 1st Defendant here, and the subject-matter in dispute here relate to assets and shareholdings of one of the several c
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
