FEDERAL COURT (PUTRAJAYA)
AZAHAR MOHAMED, CJ, NALLINI PATHMANATHAN, J, ABDUL RAHMAN, J, ZALEHA YUSOF, J
Auspicious Journey Sdn Bhd – Appellant
Versus
Ebony Ritz Sdn Bhd & Ors – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court ruling on actions of majority shareholders against minority interests. (Para 39 , 40 , 44 , 46) |
| 2. conclusion on whether liability extends to directors in shareholder oppression claims. (Para 162 , 163) |
[33]Why and how had this series of supervening events in breach of the several OFRA agreements occurred? Hoe Leong’s explanation was that when Sumatec and Semua International ran into financial difficulties, the joint venture fell apart due to Auspicious Journ ey wanting to extricate itself from its investment but Hoe Leong wished to continue. In these circumstances, in order to salvage the enterprise, Hoe Leong maintained that it was necessary to enter into the conditional agreement , which was effectively a salvage and warehousing arrangement. It is pertinent that the conditional SPA never became unconditional and the sale did not go through.
[34]In March 2013, Auspicious Journey became aware of the salvaging and warehousing arrangement. By April 2013, Auspicious Journey realised that Setinggi Holdings was the nominee utilised for the 49% shareholding investment in Semua International under the salvage and warehousing arrangement. It was also made known to Au
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.