Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
Q2 ENGINEERING SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
PJI-LFGC (VIETNAM) LTD & ORS (NO 2) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. existence of binding contract obligations. (Para 1 , 1) |
| 2. summary of parties involved and contractual engagements. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 6 , 9) |
| 3. timeline and actions leading to claim. (Para 5 , 7) |
| 4. claim against multiple defendants. (Para 8) |
| 5. details of claims and financial amounts sought. (Para 10 , 12 , 14 , 15) |
| 6. nature of engineering works claimed. (Para 11 , 13) |
| 7. observations on the plaintiff's claim and evidence presented. (Para 18 , 20 , 21) |
| 8. registration act and its effect on enforcement. (Para 30) |
| 9. discussion on statutory compliance regarding engineering work. (Para 43 , 44 , 55) |
| 10. nature of cost-plus contract and impact of agreements. (Para 60 , 66 , 75) |
| 11. tort of inducing breach of contract. (Para 76 , 81 , 82) |
| 12. inducement for breach of contract. (Para 80 , 84) |
| 13. conclusion on the validity of claims and dismissal of actions. (Para 86 , 96) |
[1] When parties said that a certain document containing terms and conditions that parties have agreed upon shall form a binding contract between them while awaiting a another more formal contract to be entered into, is there a binding contract that has come into existence, that would entitle the non-defaulting
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
