CIMB Bank Bhd – Appellant
Versus
Maybank Trustees Bhd and other appeals – Respondent
INTRODUCTION
[1]There are five appeals before this court and they are:
(a) Civil Appeal No 02(f)-27–04 of 2012 (W) with CIMB Bank Bhdas the appellant and Maybank Trustees Bhd as therespondent;
(b) Civil Appeal No 02(f)-28–04 of 2012(W) with Datin Murnina bt Dato' Hj Sujak as the appellant and Maybank Trustees Bhdas the respondent;
(c) Civil Appeal No 02(f)-29–04 of 2012(W) with KAF InvestmentBank Bhd as the appellant and MIDF Amanah InvestmentBank Bhd and 11 others as the respondents;
(d) Civil Appeal No 02(f)-30–04 of 2012(W) with Maybank TrusteesBhd as the appellant and MIDF Amanah Investment BankBhd and 20 others as the respondents; and
(e) Civil Appeal No 02(f)-33–04 of 2012 (W) with Pesaka Astana (M)Sdn Bhd and eight others as the appellants and Maybank TrusteesBhd and another as the respondents.
For convenience, we will first deal with the third appeal.
[2]This court had on 5 April 2012 granted leave to appeal to KAF Investment Bank Bhd ('KAF') on the following questions of law:
(a) What liability in law is assumed by an issuer, lead arranger, facility agent and issue agent with respect to matters contained in an information memorandum?
(b) To whom
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.