SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 MarsdenLR 5648

COURT OF APPEAL (PUTRAJAYA)
AZIZAH NAWAWI, CHE MOHD RUZIMA GHAZALI, AHMAD ZAIDI IBRAHIM, AZMAN ABDULLAH, AZHAHARI KAMAL RAMLI, JJ
Mahiaddin bin Md Yasin – Appellant
Versus
Public Prosecutor – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Introduction

[1]The Applicant has filed this review application under Rule 105Rules of Court of Appeal 1994RCA 1994”), seeking this Court to invoke its inherent jurisdiction to invalidate a previous decision made by a different panel on 28 February 2024. The earlier decision had overturned a High Court decision to discharge and acquit the Applicant in respect of abuse of power charges under subsection 23(1) Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2009 MACC Act”).

Background Facts

[2]The Applicant was charged in the Sessions Court with four (4) charges for abuse of power under subsection 23(1)MACC Act

Pertuduhan Pertama:

Bahawa kamu di antara 8 Februari 2021 dan 25 Februari 2021 di Pejabat Perdana Menteri, Blok Utama, Bangunan Perdana Putra, Pusat Pentadbiran Kerajaan Persekutuan, di dalam Wilayah Persekutuan Putrajaya, sebagai seorang pegawai badan awam, iaitu Perdana Menteri Malaysia dan Presiden Parti Pribumi Bersatu Malaysia, telah menggunakan kedudukan kamu untuk satu suapan, iaitu wang berjumlah RM200,000,000.00 (Ringgit Malaysia Dua Ratus Juta) daripada Bukhary Equity Sdn. Bhd., bagi sekutu kamu iaitu Parti Pribumi Bersatu Malaysia, oleh yang demikian kamu telah melakukan

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top