Malaysia Plastics Sdn Bhd – Appellant
Versus
United Overseas Bank (M) Bhd and another suit – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegation of forgery and payment without authority. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. background on account opening and mandates. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. verification process of cheques and customer communication. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. expert testimony and analysis on signatures. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 37) |
| 5. legal framework under the bills of exchange act. (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43) |
| 6. conclusion determining forgery and liability. (Para 94 , 95) |
[1]The plaintiff in this case, Malaysia Plastic Sdn Bhd (‘customer’) was a customer of the defendant, United Overseas Bank (Malaysia) Bhd (‘the bank’) and maintained with it, several accounts. It has brought this suit against the bank in relation to eight cheques amounting to RM1,608,000 (‘disputed cheques’) which the customer has alleged were wrongfully and without authority paid out from the customer’s current account with the bank.
[2]The bank had, both prior to and after the issuance of these eight cheques, honoured by payment on presentation, several tens of cheques, totaling several hundred thousand ringgit. The majority of these cheques were legitimate or valid cheques that were
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.