SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 MarsdenLR 7038

Malaysia Plastics Sdn Bhd – Appellant
Versus
United Overseas Bank (M) Bhd and another suit – Respondent


Table of Content
1. allegation of forgery and payment without authority. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. background on account opening and mandates. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 9 , 10 , 11)
3. verification process of cheques and customer communication. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
4. expert testimony and analysis on signatures. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 37)
5. legal framework under the bills of exchange act. (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43)
6. conclusion determining forgery and liability. (Para 94 , 95)

Nallini Pathmanathan J:

[1]The plaintiff in this case, Malaysia Plastic Sdn Bhd (‘customer’) was a customer of the defendant, United Overseas Bank (Malaysia) Bhd (‘the bank’) and maintained with it, several accounts. It has brought this suit against the bank in relation to eight cheques amounting to RM1,608,000 (‘disputed cheques’) which the customer has alleged were wrongfully and without authority paid out from the customer’s current account with the bank.

[2]The bank had, both prior to and after the issuance of these eight cheques, honoured by payment on presentation, several tens of cheques, totaling several hundred thousand ringgit. The majority of these cheques were legitimate or valid cheques that were

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top