Back
Pendakwa Raya lwn Zul bin Hassan dan lain-lain
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of appeals and their nature. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. details of the appeals and court orders. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. facts of the bribery case. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 12) |
| 4. arguments from the prosecution. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. key legal questions regarding evidence. (Para 19 , 20) |
| 6. admissibility of agency provocateur testimony. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 26) |
| 7. hearsay evidence and its implications. (Para 28 , 29 , 33) |
| 8. requirements for wiretapped evidence. (Para 35 , 36 , 39 , 40) |
| 9. requirements for proving bribery. (Para 43 , 44) |
| 10. analysis of specific charges and evidence. (Para 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 55) |
| 11. conclusion of the court's decision. (Para 58 , 59) |
[1]Ini adalah rayuan oleh Pendakwa Raya Malaysia (‘perayu’) terhadap keputusan pesuruhjaya kehakiman Mahkamah Tinggi Ipoh, Perak (‘PK’) pada 22 April 2011 yang menolak rayuan perayu dan mengekalkan perintah pelepasan dan pembebasan di akhir kes pendakwaan yang dibuat oleh Mahkamah Sesyen Ipoh bagi beberapa pertuduhan di bawah s 10(a)(aa) Akta Pencegahan Rasuah 1997 (‘Akta 575’)s 16Akta yang sama.
[2]Terdapat juga rayuan silang (‘cross-appeal’) oleh Usaili bin Alias da
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
