SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 MarsdenLR 6558

Abdul Ghaffar bin Md Amin – Appellant
Versus
Ibrahim bin Yusoff & Anor – Respondent


Abdul Hamid Mohamad Chief Justice (delivering judgment of the court):

We heard this application on 28 January 2008 and dismissed it. These are my grounds.

The respondents who were the plaintiffs in the sessions court filed an action at the sessions court, Georgetown, Penang claiming for general and special damages, interest and costs. The claim was a dependency claim arising from an accident in which the deceased, a pillion rider on a motorcycle had died. The sessions court decided in favour of the respondents as follows:

a.LiabilityDefendant wholly negligent
b.DependencyFor seven years ie Pretrial 44 month x RM220 = RM8,800 Post-trial 40 months x RM200 = RM8,000
c.Funeral expensesRM2,000

The respondents, being dissatisfied with the multiplier and the multiplicand awarded, appealed to the High Court. The High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the decision of the sessions court.

The respondents further appealed to the Court of Appeal. The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal in part. It did not allow the increase in the multiplicand but allowed the appeal in respect of the multiplier by increasing the multiplier to 16 years.

The applicant (who was the defendants in the sessions court) now

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top