HIGH COURT (KUALA LUMPUR)
ALIZA SULAIMAN, JC
Sinerjuta Sdn Bhd – Appellant
Versus
Jo Architects Sdn Bhd – Respondent
GROUNDS OF JUDGMENT Introduction
[1]This is an appeal against the decision of the learned Sessions Court Judge (‘SCJ’) on 18.1.2021 in dismissing the Appellant’s application dated 19.11.2020 (encl. 6) for a stay of the proceedings pursuant to s 10Arbitration Act 2005Act 646] (‘AA 2005’); O. 69, r. 10 and O. 92, r. 4 of the Rules of Court 2012 (‘RoC 2012’); ss 415053Specific Relief Act 1950Act 137]; ss 6599Subordinate Courts Act 1948Act 92]; and/ or the inherent jurisdiction of the Court. The SCJ had also ordered the Appellant to pay costs of RM1,000.00 to the Respondent.
[2]After having read and considered the Record of Appeal (encl. 3) and the written submissions filed by the parties (encls. 5, 6, 8 and 9), I had dismissed the appeal with costs of RM2,500.00 to be paid by the Appellant to the Respondent, subject to allocatur.
[3]The Appellant is dissatisfied with the decision and is pursuing an appeal to the Court of Appeal. My reasons for the determination of this appeal are elaborated below.
[4]In these Grounds of Judgment (‘GoJ’), the parties shall be referred to as they are in the court below.
Background Facts
[5]According to the Statement of Claim dated 13.10.2020
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.