SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img



Abu Mansor J

By ex parte Summons-in-Chambers dated May 27, 1985, the plaintiff applied for an interlocutory injunction to restrain the 1st defendant (Sabah State Assembly) from sitting until the determination of Kota Kinabalu High Court Civil Suit No. K.467 of 1985 (the 1st Suit), 2nd defendant (Speaker) from conducting, permitting or causing to be permitted or continuing a sitting or any proceedings of the 1st defendant until after the trial of the 1st Suit and 3rd defendant (Deputy Speaker) from conducting, permitting or causing to be permitted or continuing a sitting or any proceedings of the 1st defendant or carrying out the duties or performing the functions of the 2nd defendant similarly until after the trial of the said 1st Suit. I dismissed the plaintiff's application against the defendants and I now give my reasons.

In support of the plaintiff's application for the interlocutory injunction the plaintiff swore an affidavit stating that apart from this Civil Suit No. K482 of 1985 (the 2nd Suit) filed on the May 27, 1985 under which this present injunction was being applied for the plaintiff had also filed in Kota Kinabalu High Court on May 22, 1985 the 1st Suit naming the Ya

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top