EMBULDENIYA v. PALEPANE
Present : Dalton J.
EMBULDENIYA v. PALIPANE.
Kurunegala, 27,810.
Vehicles
Ordinance-Overloading a motor omnibus-Liability of owner- Validity of
by-law-Ordinance No, 4 of 1916, s. 18.
A motor omnibus is a motor car within the meaning of by-law 2(a) made under the
provisions of section 18 of the Vehicles Ordinance.
The by-law 2 (6), which makes the owner liable equally with the driver for the
act of the latter in exceeding the maximum number of passengers which a motor
omnibus is licensed to carry, is valid.
APPEAL
from a conviction by the Police Magistrate of
Kurunegala. The accused was charged, as the owner of a motor omnibus, with
having overloaded the omnibus in breach of by-law 2 (b) made under the
provisions of section 18 of the Vehicles Ordinance, 1916. It was admitted that
the omnibus was licensed to carry passengers and was the property of the
accused, and that the driver had carried more than the licensed number of
passengers without the knowledge of the accused. The accused was convicted, and
he appealed from the conviction on two grounds :-
(1) That a motor omnibus is not a motor car ;
(2) That the by-law is ultra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.