H.N.G. FERNANDO, J
MACKEEN – Appellant
Versus
SALLIEH – Respondent
1956 Present: H. N. G.
Fernando, J.
O. L. M. MACKEEN, Appellant, and M. V. M. SALLIEH.
Respondent
S. C. 80-C. R. Colombo, 58,773
Reset Restriction Act, No. 29
of 1948-Section 13-" Arrear of rent "Informal written agreement between landlord
and tenant-Deposit of sum to cover last two months' rental-Should it be set off
against any unpaid rent ?-Prevention of Frauds Ordinance.
A tenant would be in arrear of rent within the meaning of section 13 of the
Rent Restriction Act even if a small portion only of the rent due remains
unpaid.
An informal written contract of monthly tenancy contained a recital that the
tenant had deposited a certain sum of money to be taken as rent for the last two
months "on the determination of the tenancy by consent or by process of law".
Held, that the landlord was not bound, even without a request of the tenant in
that behalf, to apply the deposited sum in satisfaction of unpaid rent for any
two month-s. It could not be contended that the provision in the agreement
regarding the deposit of two months' rent was unlawful as being in breach of
tile Prevention of Frauds Ordinance in that it purported to Stave the eff
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.