The Limitation Act, 1963
(1) This Act may be called the Limitation Act, 1963.
(2) It extends to the whole of India 1***.
(3) It shall come into force on such date2
as the Central Government may, by notification in the
Official Gazette, appoint.
In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,--
(a) "applicant" includes--
(i) a petitioner;
(ii) any person from or through whom an applicant derives his right to apply;
(iii) any person whose estate is represented by the applicant as executor, administrator or
other representative;
(b) "application" includes a petition;
(c) "bill of exchange" includes a hundi and a cheque;
(d) "bond" includes any instrument wh
(1) Subject to the provisions contained in sections 4 to 24 (inclusive), every
suit instituted, appeal preferred, and application made after the prescribed period shall be dismissed,
although limitation has not been set up as a defence.
(2) For the purposes of this Act,--
(a) a suit is instituted,--
(i) in an ordinary case, when the plaint is presented to the proper officer;
(ii) in the case of a pauper, when his application for leave to sue as a pauper is m
Where the prescribed period for any suit,
appeal or application expires on a day when the court is closed, the suit, appeal or application may be
instituted, preferred or made on the day when the court re-opens.
Explanation.--A court shall be deemed to be closed on any day within the meaning of this section if
during any part of its normal working hours it remains closed on that day.
Any appeal or any application, other than an
application under any of the provisions of Order XXI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908),
may be admitted after the prescribed period if the appellant or the applicant satisfies the court that he had
sufficient cause for not preferring the appeal or making the application within such period.
Explanation.--The fact that the appellant or the applicant was misled by any order, practice or
judgment of the High Court in ascertaining or computing the prescribed period may be sufficient cause
within the meaning of this section.
(1) Where a person entitled to institute a suit or make an application for the
execution of a decree is, at the time from which the prescribed period is to be reckoned, a minor or insane,
or an idiot, he may institute the suit or make the application within the same period after the disability has
ceased, as would otherwise have been allowed from the time specified therefor in the third column of the
Schedule.
(2) Where such person is, at the time from which the prescribed period is to be reckoned, affected by
two such disabilities, or where, before his disability has ceased, he is affected by another disability, he
may institute the suit or make the application within the same period after both disabilities have ceased, as
would otherwise have been allowed from the time so specified.
Where one of several persons jointly entitled to institute a
suit or make an application for the execution of a decree is under any such disability, and a discharge can
be given without the concurrence of such person, time will run against them all; but, where no such
discharge can be given, time will not run as against any of them until one of them becomes capable of
giving such discharge without the concurrence of the others or until the disability has ceased.
Explanation I.—This section applies to a discharge from every kind of liability, including a liability
in respect of any immovable property.
Explanation II.—For the purposes of this section, the Manager of a Hin
Nothing in section 6 or in section 7 applies to suits to enforce rights of
pre-emption, or shall be deemed to extend, for more than three years from the cessation of the disability
or the death of the person affected thereby, the period of limitation for any suit or application.
Where once time has begun to run, no subsequent disability or
inability to institute a suit or make an application stops it:
Provided that, where letters of administration to the estate of a creditor have been granted to his
debtor, the running of the period of limitation for a suit to recover the debt shall be suspended while the
administration continues.
Notwithstanding anything contained in the
foregoing provisions of this Act, no suit against a person in whom property has become vested in trust for
any specific purpose, or against his legal representatives or assigns (not being assigns for valuable
consideration), for the purpose of following in his or their hands such property, or the proceeds thereof, or
for an account of such property or proceeds, shall be barred by any length of time.
Explanation.—For the purposes of this section any property comprised in a Hindu, Muslim or
Buddhist religious or charitable endowment shall be deemed to be property vested in trust for a specific
purpose and the manager of the property shall be deemed to be the trustee thereof.
(1) Suits
instituted in the territories to which this Act extends on contracts entered into in the State of Jammu and
Kashmir or in a foreign country shall be subject to the rules of limitation contained in this Act.
(2) No rule of limitation in force in the State of Jammu and Kashmir or in a foreign country shall be a
defence to a suit instituted in the said territories on a contract entered into in that State on in a foreign
country unless—
(a) the rule has extinguished the contract; and
(b)
(1) In computing the period of limitation for any suit,
appeal or application, the day from which such period is to be reckoned, shall be excluded.
(2) In computing the period of limitation for an appeal or an application for leave to appeal or for
revision or for review of a judgment, the day on which the judgment complained of was pronounced and
the time requisite for obtaining a copy of the decree, sentence or order appealed from or sought to be
revised or reviewed shall be excluded.
(3) Where a decree or order is appealed from or sought to be revised or reviewed, or where an
application is made for leave to appeal from a decree or order, the time requisite for obtaining a copy of
In
computing the period of limitation prescribed for any suit or appeal in any case where an application for
leave to sue or appeal as a pauper has been made and rejected, the time during which the applicant has
been prosecuting in good faith his application for such leave shall be excluded, and the court may, on
payment of the court fees prescribed for such suit or appeal, treat the suit or appeal as having the same
force and effect as if the court fees had been paid in the first instance.
(1) In computing the
period of limitation for any suit the time during which the plaintiff has been prosecuting with due
diligence another civil proceeding, whether in a court of first instance or of appeal or revision, against the
defendant shall be excluded, where the proceeding relates to the same matter in issue and is prosecuted in
good faith in a court which, from defect of jurisdiction or other cause of a like nature, is unable to
entertain it.
(2) In computing the period of limitation for any application, the time during which the applicant has
been prosecuting with due diligence another civil proceeding, whether in a court of first instance or of
appeal or revision, against the same party for the same relief shall be excluded, where such proceeding is
prosecuted in good faith in a court
(1) In computing the period of limitation of any suit
or application for the execution of a decree, the institution or execution of which has been stayed by
injunction or order, the time of the continuance of the injunction or order, the day on which it was issued
or made, and the day on which it was withdrawn, shall be excluded.
(2) In computing the period of limitation for any suit of which notice has been given, or for which the
previous consent or sanction of the Government or any other authority is required, in accordance with the
requirements of any law for the time being in force, the period of such notice or, as the case may be, the
time required for obtaining such consent or sanction shall be excluded.
(1) Where a person who would, if
he were living, have a right to institute a suit or make an application dies before the right accrues, or
where a right to institute a suit or make an application accrues only on the death of a person, the period of
limitation shall be computed from the time when there is a legal representative of the deceased capable of
instituting such suit or making such application.
(2) Where a person against whom, if he were living, a right to institute a suit or make an application
would have accrued dies before the right accrues, or where a right to institute a suit or make an
application against any person accrues on the death of such person, the period of limitation shall be
computed from the time when there is a legal representative of the deceased against whom the plain
(1) Where, in the case of any suit or application for which a period
of limitation is prescribed by this Act,—
(a) the suit or application is based upon the fraud of the defendant or respondent or his agent; or
(b) the knowledge of the right or title on which a suit or application is founded is concealed by
the fraud of any such person as aforesaid; or
(c) the suit or application is for relief from the consequences of a mistake; or
(1) Where, before the expiration of the prescribed
period for a suit or application in respect of any property or right, an acknowledgment of liability in
respect of such property or right has been made in writing signed by the party against whom such
property or right is claimed, or by any person through whom he derives his title or liability, a fresh period
of limitation shall be computed from the time when the acknowledgment was so signed.
(2) Where the writing containing the acknowledgment is undated, oral evidence may be given of the
time when it was signed; but subject to the provisions of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (1 of 1872), oral
evidence of its contents shall not be received.
<
Where payment on account of
a debt or of interest on a legacy is made before the expiration of the prescribed period by the person liable
to pay the debt or legacy or by his agent duly authorised in this behalf, a fresh period of limitation shall be
computed from the time when the payment was made:
Provided that, save in the case of payment of interest made before the 1st day of January, 1928, an
acknowledgment of the payment appears in the handwriting of, or in a writing signed by, the person
making the payment.
Explanation.—For the purposes of this section,—
(1) The expression "agent duly
authorised in this behalf" in sections 18 and 19 shall, in the case of a person under disability, include his
lawful guardian, committee or manager or an agent duly authorised by such guardian, committee or
manager to sign the acknowledgment or make the payment.
(2) Nothing in the said sections renders one of several joint contractors, partners, executors or
mortgagees chargeable by reason only of a written acknowledgment signed by, or of a payment made by,
or by the agent of, any other or others of them.
(3) For the purposes of the said sections,—
(1) Where after the institution of
a suit, a new plaintiff or defendant is substituted or added, the suit shall, as regards him, be deemed to
have been instituted when he was so made a party:
Provided that where the court is satisfied that the omission to include a new plaintiff or defendant was
due to a mistake made in good faith it may direct that the suit as regards such plaintiff or defendant shall
be deemed to have been instituted on any earlier date.
(2) Nothing in sub-section (1) shall apply to a case where a party is added or substituted owing to
assignment or devolution of any interest during the pendency of a suit or where a plaintiff is made a
defendant or a defendant is m
In the case of a continuing breach of contract or in the case of
a continuing tort, a fresh period of limitation begins to run at every moment of the time during which the
breach or the tort, as the case may be, continues.
In the case of a suit
for compensation for an act which does not give rise to a cause of action unless some specific injury
actually results therefrom, the period of limitation shall be computed from the time when the injury
results.
All instruments shall for the purposes of this
Act be deemed to be made with reference to the Gregorian calendar.
(1) Where the access and use of light or air to and
for any building have been peaceably enjoyed therewith as an easement, and as of right, without
interruption, and for twenty years, and where any way or watercourse or the use of any water or any other
easement (whether affirmative or negative) has been peaceably and openly enjoyed by any person
claiming title thereto as an easement and as of right without interruption and for twenty years, the right to
such access and use of light or air, way, watercourse, use of water, or other easement shall be absolute
and indefeasible.
(2) Each of the said periods of twenty years shall be taken to be a period ending within two years next
before the institution of the suit wherein the claim to which such period relates is contested.
Where any land or water upon, over
or from, which any easement has been enjoyed or derived has been held under or by virtue of any interest
for life or in terms of years exceeding three years from the granting thereof, the time of the enjoyment of
such easement during the continuance of such interest or term shall be excluded in the computation of the
period twenty years in case the claim is, within three years next after the determination of such interest or
term resisted by the person entitled on such determination to the said land or water.
At the determination of the period hereby limited to any
person for instituting a suit for possession of any property, his right to such property shall be
extinguished.
[Amendment of certain Acts.]— Rep. by Repealing and Amending Act, 1974 (56 of 1974), s. 2 and
the First Schedule (w.e.f. 20-12-1974).
(1) Nothing in this Act shall affect section 25 of the Indian Contract
Act, 1872 (9 of 1872).
(2) Where any special or local law prescribes for any suit, appeal or application a period of limitation
different from the period prescribed by the Schedule, the provisions of section 3 shall apply as if such
period were the period prescribed by the Schedule and for the purpose of determining any period of
limitation prescribed for any suit, appeal or application by any special or local law, the provisions
contained in sections 4 to 24 (inclusive) shall apply only in so far as, and to the extent to which, they are
not expressly excluded by such special or local law.
(3) Save as otherwise pr
Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act,--
(a) any suit for which the period of limitation is shorter than the period of limitation prescribed by
the Indian Limitation Act, 1908 (9 of 1908), may be instituted within a period of 1
[seven years next]
after the commencement of this Act or within the period prescribed for such suit by the Indian
Limitation Act, 1908 (9 of 1908), whichever period expires earlier:
2[Provided that if in respect of any such suit, the said period of seven years expires earlier than
the period of limitation prescribed therefor under the Indian Limitation Act, 1908 (9 of 1908) and the
said period of seven years together with so much of the period
Nothing in this Act shall,—
(a) enable any suit, appeal or application to be instituted, preferred or made, for which the period
of limitation prescribed by the Indian Limitation Act, 1908 (9 of 1908), expired before the
commencement of this Act; or
(b) affect any suit, appeal or application instituted, preferred or made before, and pending at, such
commencement.
[Repeal.]--Rep. by Repealing and Amending Act, 1974 (56 of 1974), s. 2 and the First Schedule
(w.e.f. 20-12-1974).
Elevate your legal practice with advanced AI-driven research and drafting solutions. Experience unmatched efficiency, precision, and security, tailored exclusively for legal professionals.