KULDIP SINGH, A.S.ANAND
D. K. Basu: Ashok K. Johari – Appellant
Versus
State Of W. B. : State Of U. P. – Respondent
Ratio Decidendi:
Custodial violence, including torture and death in lock-ups, violates the rule of law, as executive powers must derive from and be limited by law. (!) [1000013550008]
The fundamental right to life and personal liberty under Article 21 extends to convicts, undertrials, detenues, and prisoners in custody, permitting only reasonable restrictions per procedure established by law, and prohibits any form of torture, cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment by state functionaries. (!) [1000013550016][1000013550020] (!) (!)
Monetary compensation is an appropriate, effective remedy in public law for established violations of Article 21 by public servants, based on strict liability, with the State vicariously liable (and entitled to indemnification from the wrongdoer); sovereign immunity is unavailable, and such compensation is compensatory (not punitive), additional to private law remedies like civil suits, with quantum depending on case facts. (!) [1000013550009] (!) (!) (!) (!)
To prevent custodial abuse, the following 11 requirements must be followed in all arrests/detentions (in addition to constitutional/statutory safeguards, applicable to police and other agencies), with non-compliance attracting departmental action and contempt proceedings:
Arresting/interrogating personnel must wear visible identification/name tags; particulars recorded in a register. (!)
Memo of arrest prepared at arrest time, attested by family member/respectable local witness, countersigned by arrestee, noting time/date. (!)
Arrestee entitled to inform friend/relative/known person of welfare interest promptly (unless attesting witness is such). (!)
If relative/friend outside district/town, notify via District Legal Aid Organisation/police station telegraphically within 8-12 hours. (!)
Arrestee must be informed of right to notify someone upon arrest/detention. (!)
Diary entry at detention place disclosing arrest, informed person's name, and custody officials' details. (!)
On request, examine arrestee at arrest for injuries, record in "Inspection Memo" signed by both, copy to arrestee. (!)
Medical exam by trained approved doctor every 48 hours during custody; Director of Health Services to maintain panels. (!)
Copies of documents (incl. arrest memo) sent to area Magistrate. (!)
Arrestee permitted lawyer meetings during (not throughout) interrogation. (!)
Police control rooms at district/state HQs to receive/display arrest/custody info within 12 hours. (!)
These requirements flow from Articles 21/22(1), must be publicized (circulated, broadcast, pamphlets), and promote transparency/accountability. (!) (!) (!) (!) (!)
Abuse of arrest/detention powers requires justification (e.g., per National Police Commission criteria), scientific investigation, police training in human values, and legislative amendments (e.g., Evidence Act presumption for custody injuries).[1000013550018][1000013550019] (!) (!)
JUDGMENT
Dr. Anand, J.-The Executive Chairman, Legal Aid Services, West Bengal, a non-political organisation registered under the Societies Registration Act, on 26th August, 1986 addressed a letter to the Chief Justice of India drawing his attention to certain news items published in the Telegraph dated 20, 21 and 22 of July, 1986 and in the Statesman and Indian Express dated 17th August, 1986 regarding deaths in police lock-ups and custody. The Executive Chairman after reproducing the news items submitted that it was imperative to examine the issue in depth and to develop "custody jurisprudence" and formulate modalities for awarding compensation to the victim and/or family members of the victim for attrocities and death caused in police custody and to provide for accountability of the officers concerned. It was also stated in the letter that efforts are often made to hush up the matter of lock-up deaths and thus the crime goes unpunished and "flourishes". It was requested that the letter alongwith the news items be treated as a writ petition under "public interest litigation" category.
2. Considering the importance of the issue raised in the letter and being concerned by frequent co
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.