SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 1702

SUHAS C.SEN, J.JAGANNADHA RAO
I. T. C. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal – Respondent


Judgment

M. Jagannadha Rao, J.-Leave granted.

2. The appellant has preferred this appeal against the judgment of the High Court of Karnataka dated 14.8.1997 in Writ Appeal No. 2876 of 1997. The Writ Appeal was filed against the judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 9.4.1997 dismissing the Writ Petition filed by the appellant against the orders of the Debt Recovery Tribunal and Appel­late Tribunal rejecting the application of the appellant filed under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

3. The appellant was the 5th defendant in the suit filed by the 3rd respondent, namely, the Corporation-Bank which has its zonal office at Bangalore. The suit was filed in the year 1985 by the said Bank against defendants 1 to 4 belonging to Tadikonda family residing at Guntur in Andhra Pradesh and against the appellant I.T.C. Limited. The relief claimed in the suit was for a sum of Rs. 52, 59, 639.66. The defendants 1 to 4 above mentioned are respondents 4 to 7 in this appeal. The first respondent is the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal and the 2nd respondent is the Debt Recovery Tribunal. After the suit was filed in the Civil Court it was transferred to the Debt Recovery Tribunal on 9










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top