M. M. PUNCHHI, A. P. MISRA, G. B. PATTANAIK
Arul Nadar – Appellant
Versus
Authorised Officer, Land Reforms – Respondent
Judgment
G.B. Pattanaik, J.-The question that arises for consideration in this appeal is whether the provisions of Section 21-A of the Tamil Nadu Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling on Land) Act, 1961, would apply to the facts and circumstances of the case and the appellant can derive benefit of the same, and if so, to what extent? When the matter was listed before a Bench of two Judges of this Court Their Lordships felt that there is a conflict between two decisions of this Court both rendered by two Hon’ble Judges, one in the case of V. Gopal Reddiar (dead) by LRs. & Anr. v. State of Tamil Nadu & Ors.1, to which one of us was a party, namely (Hon’ble Punchhi, J., as he then was), and the other in the case of A.G. Vardarajulu & Anr. v. State of Tamil Nadu & Ors.2, and that is how the matter has come before a three Judge Bench.
2. The appellant was the owner of 43.55 standard acres of agricultural land. He also purchased some land on 20.10.1961. The Tamil Nadu Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling Land) Act, 1961, (hereinafter referred to as “The Act”) came into force on 5.4.1960. A proceeding under the Act was initiated by the authorised officer who came to the conclusion that the appella
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.