SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 376

K.VENKATASWAMI, J.JAGANNADHA RAO
A. G. Varadaraju – Appellant
Versus
State Of T. N. – Respondent


Judgment

M. Jagannadha Rao, J.-Leave granted.

2. This appeal is preferred by the two appellants namely A.G. Varada­rajulu and Srimati V. Jayalakshmi who are respectively, husband and wife, against the order passed by the Tamilnadu Land Reforms Special Appellate Tribunal, Madras in TRP No. 82 of 1994 dated 25th April, 1995. The case arises under the Tamil Nadu Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling on Land) Act, 1961 (hereinafter called the Act)

3. The 1st appellant is the declarant. The 1st appellant’s plea is that land of an extent of acres 36.74 allotted in favour of his wife, the second appellant Smt. V. Jayalakshmi in a partition Deed dated 25.9.1970 executed between the appellants’ son. Bala­guruswamy and his wife should be excluded from his (the 1st appellant) holding as being ‘Stridhana land’ of his wife, within the meaning of the said expres­sion in Section 3(42) of the Act, to the extent permissible under Section 5(4) of the Act.

4. The following are the facts:

There was a partition deed between the first appellant and his son Balaguruswamy in the year 1959. Under the said document, each of them was allotted certain extent of the joint family property. On the basis that the wife of

























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top