J.JAGANNADHA RAO, UMESH C.BANERJEE
Mishri Lal – Appellant
Versus
Dhirendra Nath – Respondent
Judgment
Banerjee, J.-This appeal is directed against the order of the Madhya Pradesh High Court confirming the preliminary decree passed by the trial Court and allowing the plaintiffs’ claim for redemption in respect of mortgaged houses and khudkasht land.
2. The contextual facts record that the defendant-mortgagee has challenged the right of the plaintiff-mortgagor to redeem assorted items of property which were mortgaged prior to the enactment of the Madhya Bharat Zamindari Abolition Act, 1951 (Samvat 2008). The learned trial judge decreed the suit and the appeal therefrom however before the learned single judge resulted in an order of reference before a Division Bench by reason of expression of a view contra, by another Single Judge of Indore Bench in (Yakub son of Kasamji v. Yakub son of Fakir Mohammad & Ors.1).
3. On however a detail analysis of facts it appears that the plaintiff-respondent being the Zamindar of village Kamalpur, during the subsistence of the Zamindari, executed two mortgage-deeds dated 4.8.1947 and 5-1-1948 in favour of the defendant-appellant for securing thereunder a loan against movable property and houses, Zamindari and Khudkhast lands. The possession
Merhaban Singh v. Naresh Singh
Bishamber Dass Kohli v. Satya Bhalla
Gangeshwar Limited v. State of U.P. & Ors.
Kattite Valappil Pathumma & Ors. v. Taluk Land Board & Ors.
Raj Narain Pandey & Ors. v. Sant Prasad Tewari & Ors.
Button v. Director of Public Prosecution, Swain v. Director of Public Prosecutions
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.