SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(SC) 543

B.N.AGARWAL, G.B.PATTANAIK, UMESH C.BANERJEE
Gurudevdatta Vksss Maryadit – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Banerjee, J.-Leave granted.

2. Urgency of the situation has prompted this Court to dispose of the present Special Leave Petition under Article 136 of the Constitution even at the stage of admission : Urgency being initiation of election process of Kolhapur District Central Co-operative Bank in the State of Maharashtra. Incidentally, Bombay High Court has negatived the petitioners contention of restrictive list of voters in terms of the proviso to Section 27(3) as added by the amendment to the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - the primary reason being - the entire election programme, including the list of voters stands finalised on June 30, 2000 and the amendment by way of addition to the proviso was effected on 23rd August, 2000: The introduction of the amended proviso being effected subsequent to the finalisation of the voters list, the High Court concluded that basically, the inclusion of the Societies which were eligible on 30th June, 2000 could not be faulted on the basis of the amendment which was brought into force subsequently and they cannot be denied the right to vote and hence the Appeal before this Court.

3. Before adverting to the submissions advance








































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top