JUDGMENT

R.C. Lahoti, J.-A decree for recovery of possession passed by the Trial Court against the respondent -has been reversed by High Court in a revision preferred by her. The aggrieved landlady has filed this petition seeking special leave to appeal under Article 136 of the Constitution.

2. Leave granted.

3. The suit premises are situated in Rajaji Nagar, Bangalore. The appellant no.1 is admittedly the owner and landlady of the premises and respondent is holding the same as a tenant on a monthly rent of Rs. 1100/-. Appellant No. 2 was joined as plaintiff because she used to collect rent for and on behalf of appellant no.1. The respondent s eviction was sought for on the ground available under Section 21 (1)(h) of the Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961. It is not disputed that there are eleven members in the family of appellant No.1 and residing with her presently in a house situated in village Bettalasoor. In the petition filed on 25.2.1993 the requirement as set out in the petition was that appellant No. 1 s husband was suffering from asthma and respiratory problems and taking oxygen regularly from the cylinder and for medical treatment he was frequently required to be take