ORDER

Banerjee, J.-Leave granted.

2. A significant departure from the regular norm in the matter of pronouncement of judgment is the key factor in the present appeal. Mentioned hereinbefore a significant departure in the matter of pronouncement of judgment - but what is it so significant so as to warrant interference of this Court under Article 136 of the Constitution - Before adverting to the same, however, a brief factual reference would be convenient and necessary for appreciation of such a departure - against an order of acquittal recorded by 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur in Sessions Trial No. 258 of 1992, a revisional application stands filed before the High Court of Judicature at Patna recording therein that on appreciation of evidence the order, as passed by the learned Sessions Judge, was totally perverse on the face of the judgment. It is on the basis aforesaid, the learned Single Judge in the revisional application in his judgment (impugned before this Court) in three different settings in the body of the judgment stated :

(a) "Be it what it may, I am not going into the merit of the case in depth but on perusal of the impuged judgment particul