SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 805

DORAISWAMY RAJU, ARIJIT PASAYAT
Augustine Saldanha – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Arijit Pasayat, J.-These two appeals relate to the common judgment of Karnataka High Court whereby the judgment of acquittal passed by the Trial Court was set aside. Augustine Saldanha-appellant in Criminal appeal No. 854/1996 was held guilty of offence punishable under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short IPC ) and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life. Rocky Saldanha-appellant in Criminal appeal no. 1734/1996 was found guilty for offences punishable under Section 324 IPC and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for one year. They were also sentenced to pay fine of Rs. 5,000/- and Rs. 1,000/- respectively with default stipulation of six months SI and one month SI respectively. Accusations which formed foundation of prosecution version are essentially as follows:

2. On 17-5-1989 Paul Saldanha (hereinafter referred to as the deceased ) and Felix Saldanha (PW1) were returning to their houses after viewing a movie. When they reached near the house of the appellants, accused Augustine and Rocky along with Henry Saldanha (acquitted) assaulted the deceased. They were armed with sticks. As a result of the assaults the deceased breathed his last while PW1 suffered gr










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top