SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 285

Y.K.SABHARWAL, ARIJIT PASAYAT
Shankar Narayan Bhadolkar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Arijit Pasayat, J. - Pandurang Varambale (hereinafter referred to as the deceased ) would not have in his wildest dreams on 8.5.1982 dreamt when he left home to attend the invitation extended by the appellant Shankar Narayan Bhadolkar (hereinafter referred to as accused A-1), that he would never return alive. The appellant allegedly shot him dead by a gun when the deceased was in his house in response to his invitation to attend a marriage celebration. The appellant along with his wife Laxmibai (A-4), son Dinkar (A-3) and one Sambhaji Mahadeo Patil (A-2) faced trial. They were charged for commission of offences punishable under Sections 302, 201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the IPC ). Appellant was alternatively charged for commission of offence punishable under Section 302, 201 and Section 25(1A) of the Arms Act, 1959 (in short the Arms Act ).

2. The trial Court found the appellant guilty of the offences punishable under Sections 302, 201 IPC and 25 of the Arms Act. The other three co-accused persons were acquitted. Appellant was sentenced to undergo life imprisonment, two years and six months respectively, with fines and default stipula





























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top