SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
4th May 1956
VIVIAN BOSE, JAGANNADHA DAS AND SINHA, JJ.
Jaswantrai Manilal Akhaney, Appellant
Versus
The State of Bombay, Respondent.
Criminal Appeal No. 152 of 1954
Advocates appeared
Mr. H. J. Umrigar and Mr. R. A. Govind, Advocates, for Appellant; Mr. Porus A. Mehta and Mr. R. H. Dhebar for Mr. P. G. Gokhale, Advocates, for Respondent.
-under Section 545(l) the Court may direct the liquidator to himself prosecute the offender or refer the matter to the Registrar. Giving an opportunity to the offender before such direction is given by the Court is not a pre-requisite of the Judge making an order under sub-section (1). Under sub-section (1) the Registrar is required to give the offender an opportunity to show cause before a prosecution is undertaken. That is a far step from saying that Section 545 (1) of the Act requires a Judge to give the offender an opportunity before he gives a direction for prosecution by the liquidator or for reference to the Registrar. As held in the case of Dr. Sailendranath Sinha v. Jasoda Dulal Adhikary, AIR 1959 SC 51 : 28 Com. Cas. 609 : 1959 S.C-R. 1263 : 1959 S.CJ. 205 : 1959 Mad L.J. (Crl.) 122 : (1959) I Mad. LJ. (SC) 127. Section 545 (1) does not lay down any procedure for the giving of directions and the provisions in regard to the action taken by the Registrar do not have any relevancy to what the Court should do before it gives directions. Besides nowhere has it stated that the Court cannot give directions without first hearing the persons accused or that the directions of the Judges are a condition precedent to the lawful institution of criminal proceedings by the liquidator. In the case of Jaswantrai Manilal v. State of Bombay, AIR 1956 SC 575 :1956 S.C.R. 483, it was held that in terms Section 457 lays down the powers of the official liquidator. Such a liquidator has to function under the directions of the Court which is in charge of the liquidation proceeding. One of his powers is to institute prosecutions in the name and on behalf of the Company under liquidation with the sanction of the Court. This Section does not purport to impose any limitations on the powers of a criminal Court to entertain a criminal prosecution launched in the ordinary course under the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Judgement
SINHA, J. : This is an appeal by special leave directed against the concurrent orders and judgments of the Courts below convicting the appellant under S. 409, Indian Penal Code and sentencing him to rigorous imprisonment for three months and a fine of Rs. 201 or in a default, further six weeks rigorous imprisonment. As the appellant had been convicted and sentenced for a similar offence in another case tried by the same Presidency Magistrate, 19th Court, Esplanade, Bombay, he directed the sentence in this case to run concurrently with the sentence in the other case. The charge against the accused in the trial Court is in these terms :-
"The accused is charged under S. 409, Indian Penal Code for committing criminal breach of trust in respect of property to wit 3 per cent Government Promissory Loan Notes 1966-68 of the face value of Rs. 50,000 and 2 1/2 per cent Government Promissory Notes 1961 of the face value of Rs. 25,000 in or about February to May 1949 entrusted to him in his capacity as Managing Director of the Exchange Bank of India and Africa Ltd. and belonging to the Cambay Hindu Merchants Co-operative Bank. (Detailed charge is separately framed)".
2. The appellant at all material times was the Managing Director of the Exchange Bank of India and Africa Ltd., with its head office at Bombay, which hereinafter will be referred to as the Exchange Bank. He held a power of attorney to act as the Managing Director on behalf of the Directors of the Company. By that power the accused was invested with the authority to borrow money on behalf of the Bank. In 1944 the Cambay Hindu Merchants Co-operative Bank at Cambay, which herein-after will be referred to as the Co-operative Bank, had opened a current account with the Exchange Bank. On instructions from the Co-operative Bank, the Exchange Bank purchased in August 1946 securities worth Rs. 25,000 in its own name with money belonging to the Co-operative bank and the securities were kept with the Exchange Bank as a cover for overdraft.
In March 1948 two further lots of Government security of Rs. 25,000 each of the value of Rs. 50,000 were purchased likewise and left with the Exchange Bank for the same purpose. On 14-5-1948 the two banks entered into a contract evidenced by three documents to be noticed in detail hereinafter. Shortly stated, the Exchange Bank agreed to grant the Co-operative Bank credit for overdraft up to a limit of Rs. 66.150 and as a security for the overdraft the Government securities of the value of Rs. 75,000 already in the custody of the Exchange Bank were pledged to the latter. These securities of the face value of Rs. 75,000 will hereinafter be referred to as "the securities," But is appears that the Co-operative Bank had no occasion to operate on the overdraft account until 28-2-1949 when the crucial event happened, namely, the Exchange Bank finding itself in an embarrassed financial position took a loan from the Canara Bank of one lakh of rupees by pleading the securities as also other securities with which we are not concerned in this case.
On 24-4-1949 the Exchange Bank paid off the dues of the Canara Bank by taking a fresh loan of the same amount of one lakh from Messrs Merwanji Dalal & Co. and pleading the same securities as had been pledged to the Canara Bank. On 28-4-1949 Messrs Merwanji Dalal & Co. demanded back their money by the forenoon of the day following. As the Exchange Bank could not pay the amount as demanded, the pledges aforesaid sold those securities including the securities belonging to the Co-operative Bank, for realising their dues, on 3-5-1949.
3. In the meantime, in answer to a letter from the Co-operative Bank to the Exchange Bank asking for a certificate for the securities held by the latter on behalf of the former in the overdraft account, the Exchange Bank issued the certificate dated 1-4-1949 to the effect that at the close of business on 31-3-1949 it held Government of India securities of the total value of Rs. 75,000 as
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.