Advocates:
B.R.L.Iyengar, K.P.BHATT, P.L.VOHRA, RAJINDAR NARAIN, RAMESHWAR NATH ROY, S.N.ANDLEY, S.T.DESAI

Certainly. Based on the provided legal document, here are the key points:

1. The provisions of the Civil Procedure Code regarding stay of suits and injunctions are clear, definite, and mandatory when the conditions for their applicability are met. Once the criteria are satisfied, the court has no discretion but to stay the suit (!) .

2. The exercise of inherent powers under Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code is meant for exceptional cases where the Code does not lay down specific procedures. Such powers should be exercised with great caution and only when absolutely necessary to do justice between the parties (!) (!) .

3. The inherent powers are not intended to control or limit the provisions of the Code but are supplementary, meant to be used to prevent abuse of process or to achieve justice in circumstances not expressly covered by the Code (!) (!) (!) .

4. The scope of inherent powers includes issuing temporary injunctions in circumstances not specifically provided for in the rules, but such powers should be exercised only in exceptional cases, and not as a routine substitute for specific procedural provisions (!) (!) (!) .

5. Orders restraining a party from proceeding with a suit in another court must be made with great care and only when absolutely necessary for justice. Such orders should not be issued lightly, especially when the suit is properly instituted in a competent court (!) (!) .

6. The legislative intent appears to favor adherence to the specific provisions of the Code, with inherent powers acting as a complement rather than a substitute. When the Code provides a specific procedure, that procedure should be followed (!) (!) .

7. The exercise of inherent jurisdiction to restrain proceedings should be based on substantial grounds, such as abuse of process or vexatious conduct, rather than mere inconvenience or distance between courts (!) (!) .

8. The courts have inherent jurisdiction to issue temporary injunctions only in circumstances that are not explicitly covered by the procedural rules, and such powers should be exercised with caution and only when necessary to prevent injustice or abuse (!) (!) .

9. The provisions of the Code are not exhaustive; however, when specific provisions exist, they must be observed, and the inherent powers should not be used to circumvent these provisions (!) (!) .

10. Orders that interfere with the proceedings of a suit in another court should be issued only when justified by exceptional circumstances, and not merely to prevent a party from exercising their legal rights in a proper forum (!) (!) .

Would you like a summary or further clarification on any specific point?