SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(SC) 2

K.S.HEGDE, S.M.SIKRI, R.S.BACHAWAT
Manubhai Nandlal Amorsey – Appellant
Versus
Popatlal Manilal Joshi – Respondent


Judgment

BACHAWAT, J.:- This appeal is directed against a judgment of a Single Judge of the Gujarat High Court setting aside the election of the appellant from the Banskantha Parliamentary constituency. At the last general election to the Lok Sabha from the Banskantha constituency in Gujarat there were three contesting candidates. The appellant, the Swatantra party candidate, secured 1,10,028 votes. Respondent No. 2, the Congress party candidate secured 1,05,621 votes. Respondent No. 3, an independent candidate secured 14,265 votes. The appellant was declared elected.

2. The election petition was filed by respondent No. 1, an elector in the constituency. Respondent No. 1 alleged a number of corrupt practices on the part of the appellant or his election agents, but at the trial, he pressed only the charge of corrupt practice under Section 123 (2) Proviso (a) (ii) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. In the petition the charge was that several persons with the consent of the appellant or his election agents induced or attempted to induce the electors to believe that if they voted for the Congress Party candidate they would become the objects of divine displeasure and spiritua
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top