A. N. GROVER, J. M. SHELAT, K. S. HEGDE, M. HIDAYATULLAH, V. BHARGAVA
Prithvi Cotton Mills – Appellant
Versus
Broach Borough Municipality – Respondent
None.
The provided legal document is the text of the judgment itself (Prithvi Cotton Mills Ltd. v. Broach Borough Municipality) and does not reference or cite any subsequent Supreme Court judgments that have followed its ratio or principles. (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!)
Judgment
HIDAYATULLAH, C.J.I. :- These matters arise under Article 226 of the Constitution and are appeals by certificate granted by the High Court of Gujarat against its judgment and order, September 10, 1966. The appellant No.1 is a Company which has spinning and weaving mills at Broach and manufactures and sells cotton yarn and cloth. Respondent No.1 is the Broach Borough Municipality constituted under Section 8 of the Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925. In the assessments years 1961-62, 1962-63 and 1963-64 the Municipality purporting to act under S.73 of the Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925 and the Rules made thereunder imposed a purported rate on lands and buildings belonging to the respondent at a certain percentage of the capital value. Section 73 of the Act allows the Municipality to levy "a rate on buildings or lands or both situate within the municipal borough". The Rules under the Act applied the rates on the basis of the percentage on the capital value of lands and buildings. The assessment lists were published and tax was imposed according to the rates calculated on the basis of the capital value of the property of the appellant and bills in respect of the tax were
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.