SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(SC) 385

A.N.GROVER, J.C.SHAH, K.S.HEGDE
Hans Raj Bagrecha – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
D.P.Singh, L.M.Singh, M.C.CHAGLA, Udaipratap Singh, V.J.Francis

Judgment

SHAH, J.-This appeal is filed with certificate granted by the High Court of Patna under Article 138(1) (a) of the Constitution.

2. The appellant Hansraj Bagrecha carries on business in jute. In the course of his business the appellant buys raw jute from producers in West Bengal, transports it to Kishanganj Railway Station (which is within the State of Bihar) and then re-exports it to purchasers in West Bengal. He also buys raw jute in Bihar and exports it to the merchants or mill owners in West Bengal by rail from Kishanganj Railway Station.

3. The Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1959, as originally enacted did not provide for levy of purchase tax. By the Bihar Finance Act, 1966, with effect from April 1, 1967, among others the following sections were incorporated in the Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1959 :

"Section 3-A.-The State Government may from time to time, by notification declare any goods to be liable to purchase tax on turnover of purchase :

Provided that general sales tax and special sales tax shall not be payable on the sale of goods or class of goods declared under this section."

"Section 5-A.-The purchase tax on goods declared under Section 3-A shall be levied at the point of purchas













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top