SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(SC) 189

I.D.DUA, K.K.MATHEW
Akalu Ahir – Appellant
Versus
Ramdeo Ram – Respondent


Judgment

DUA, J.:- This is an appeal by special leave. The three appellants and one Ramchander Kanu were tried in the court of the 2nd Assistant Sessions Judge, Chapra for offences under Sections 307 and 307/109, I. P. C. Akalu Ahir and Chandrika Singh were charged under Section 307, I. P. C. for firing pistol shots and gun shots at Ramdeo Ram at 11.00 p. m. on June 13, 1966, whereas Jagarnath and Ramchander Kanu were charged under Sections 307/109, I. P. C., for having abetted the commission of the aforesaid offence.

2. The occurrence is stated to be an off-shoot of election rivalry arising out of the election for the office of Mukhia of village Arakpur. Indeed the enmity between the two rival groups was of long standing and is not denied. But enmity as usual is a double-edged weapon, providing motive both for the offence as well as for false implication. The evidence in such a case has, therefore, to be scrutinised with care so that neither the guilty party wrongly escapes on the plea of enmity, nor an innocent person gets wrongly convicted on that basis.

3. In this case there were three eye witnesses. Ramdeo Ram, the victim of the fire shots, appeared as P. W. 1, Fuljharia as P. W.























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top