N.L.UNTWALIA, S.MURTAZA FAZAL ALI
Bhabhi – Appellant
Versus
Sheo Govind – Respondent
Judgment
FAZL ALI, J. :- By virtue of an order dated December 20, 1974 Banerji, J., of the Allahabad High Court who was designated as the Election Judge passed an order granting the application of the respondent No. 1 for a sample inspection of the ballet papers. The order directed that a sample inspection of 20 bundles of 50 ballot papers each of the votes counted in favour of the appellant may be taken out and examined along with the 5 bundles of the rejected ballot papers. It is against this order that the appellant has filed the present appeal by special leave and has assailed the order of the learned single Judge on the ground that the learned Judge has exercised his discretion illegally and improperly in allowing the sample inspection of the ballot papers without there being sufficient proof of the allegations made by the respondent in his petition for setting aside the election of the appellant.
2. The facts giving rise to the present appeal may be briefly summarised as follows :
3. The appellant was elected to the U.P. Legislative Assembly from 218, Mubarakpur Constituency in the District of Azamgarh,U. P.The last date of nomination for election to the said assembly was Janua
followed : Ram Sewak Yadav V. Hussain Kamil Kidwai and others
SHRI JITENDRA BAHADUR SINGH V. SHRI KIRSHNA BEHARI AND OTHERS
Dr. Jagjit Singh V. Giani Kartar Singn and others
SMT.SUMITRADEVI V. SHRI SHEO SHANKER PRASAD YADAV AND OTHERS
BELIRAM BHALAIK V. JAI BEHARILAL KHACHI AND ANOTHER
SURESH PRASAD YADAV V. JAI PRAKASH MISHRA AND OTHERS
CHANDA SINGH V. CHOUDHARY SHIV RAM VERMA AND OTHERS
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.