SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(SC) 286

B.C.RAY, K.RAMASWAMY
Sevaka Perumal – Appellant
Versus
State Of T. N. – Respondent


Advocates:
Alka Agrawal, Jaga Rao, Malini L.Bhat, RAJU RAMACHANDRAN, S.RAVINDER BHAT, V.KRISHNAMURTHY, V.R.Karthikeyan

JUDGMENT

K. RAMASWAMY, J.:— Special leave to appeals granted.

Heard the learned counsel, Sri Raju Ramachandran amicus curiae for the appellants and Sri V. Krishnamurthy, the learned Standing Counsel for the State. The appellants Sevaka Perumal and Isakkimuthu for short A- 1andA-2in Appeal arising out of S. L.P. (Crl.) No. 1842/90 are accused in Sessions Case No. 283 of 1986 on the file of the Addl. Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli Sessions Division and appellants in Criminal Appeal No. 594 of 1989 and R. T. No. 4 of 1989 by judgment dated June 14, 1990 of the High Court of Madras. Criminal Appeal arises out of S.L.P. (Crl.) No. 1841/ 90; Sessions Case No. 284 of 1986 of the same Sessions Division and Criminal Appeal No. 593 and R. T. No. 5 of 1989 dated June 14, 1990 of the Madras High Court respectively, A-1 is the appellant. In each case the Sessions Court convicted them under Ss. 120B, 364, 392 read with S. 397; S. 302 read with S. 34, I.P.C. and sentenced to death. In Crl. Appeal No. 594 of 1989 and R. T. No. 4 of 1989, the High Court confirmed the conviction and sentence of death of both the appellants. In Crl. Appeal No. 593 of 1989 and R. T. No. 5 of 1989, the High Court confirmed














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top