B.C.RAY, K.RAMASWAMY
Sevaka Perumal – Appellant
Versus
State Of T. N. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
K. RAMASWAMY, J.:— Special leave to appeals granted.
Heard the learned counsel, Sri Raju Ramachandran amicus curiae for the appellants and Sri V. Krishnamurthy, the learned Standing Counsel for the State. The appellants Sevaka Perumal and Isakkimuthu for short A- 1andA-2in Appeal arising out of S. L.P. (Crl.) No. 1842/90 are accused in Sessions Case No. 283 of 1986 on the file of the Addl. Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli Sessions Division and appellants in Criminal Appeal No. 594 of 1989 and R. T. No. 4 of 1989 by judgment dated June 14, 1990 of the High Court of Madras. Criminal Appeal arises out of S.L.P. (Crl.) No. 1841/ 90; Sessions Case No. 284 of 1986 of the same Sessions Division and Criminal Appeal No. 593 and R. T. No. 5 of 1989 dated June 14, 1990 of the Madras High Court respectively, A-1 is the appellant. In each case the Sessions Court convicted them under Ss. 120B, 364, 392 read with S. 397; S. 302 read with S. 34, I.P.C. and sentenced to death. In Crl. Appeal No. 594 of 1989 and R. T. No. 4 of 1989, the High Court confirmed the conviction and sentence of death of both the appellants. In Crl. Appeal No. 593 of 1989 and R. T. No. 5 of 1989, the High Court confirmed
Abdul Sattar v. Union Territory, Chandigarh
relied on : Mahesh v. State of M.P.
referred to : Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab
Rameshwar v. State of Rajasthan
Swamirathnam v. State of Madras
Sarwan Singh v. State of Punjab
B.D. Patil v. State of Maharashtra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.