SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(SC) 283

L.M.SHARMA, M.M.PUNCHHI
Poddar Steel Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Ganesh Engineering Works – Respondent


JUDGMENT


SHARMA, J. :— Special Leave is granted.

2. In response to a notice inviting tenders by the Diesel Locomotive Works, Indian Railways, in connection with disposal of one lot of Ferrous Scrap, a number of tenders were submitted by the appellant, the respondent No. 1 and other intending purchasers. The tenders of the respondent No. 1 and some other bidders were rejected as defective and the appellants offer being the highest was accepted, and accordingly the appellant deposited a sum of about Rs. 15 lacs. The respondent No. 1 challenged the decision by a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court contending that there was no defect in its tender and that the tender of the appellant could not have been validly accepted as the necessary condition of payment of Rs. 50,000/- as earnest money with the tender had not been complied with. The application was resisted on the grounds (i) that the respondent No. 1 having not deposited the earnest money at all was not entitled to a consideration of its tender and has no locus standi in the present matter; and (ii) that the appellant had substantially complied with the requirement by sending with its tender a Bankers Cheque marked and ce









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top