SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 1603

ARIJIT PASAYAT, S.H.KAPADIA
Damoh Panna Sagar Rural Regional Bank – Appellant
Versus
Munna Lal Jain – Respondent


Judgment

Arijit Pasayat, J.—Leave granted.

2. Damoh Panna Sagar, Rural Regional Bank - the appellant No.1 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘employer’) calls in question legality of the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court at Jabalpur directing the Board of Directors of the employer Bank (in short the ‘Board’) to reconsider the matter and pass any punishment other than dismissal, removal or termination of the respondent - Munna Lal Jain (hereinafter referred to as the ‘employee’).

3. Background facts in a nutshell are as follows:

On the allegation that while temporarily functioning as the Branch manager of Kabra Branch, the respondent-employee withdrew a sum of Rs. 25,000/- unauthorisedly and such act amounted to misconduct warranting serious penalty. Because of such unauthorized withdrawal, charges were framed against him by charge sheet dated 14.10.1992 alleging that he had withdrawn a sum of Rs. 25,000/- on 6.5.1992 for his personal use. The respondent-employee filed his explanation. Though not disputing the factum of withdrawal, plea was taken by him that during the relevant period condition of his wife had deteriorated and required immediate surgica












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top