SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(SC) 148

A.P.SEN, M.M.DUTT
Secretary, Central Board Of Excise And Customs – Appellant
Versus
K. S. Mahalingam – Respondent


Advocates:
ANAND PARKASH, C.V.SUBBA RAO, K.S.MAHALINGAM, R.D.AGRAWAL, T.V.S.N.Chari

Judgement

M. M. DUTT, J.:- The Special Leave Petition filed by the appellants was heard upon notice to the respondent, who appeared before us in person. As arguments have been made by both sides at the hearing of the Special Leave Petition, we proceed to dispose of the appeal after granting such leave.

2. The only question that is involved in this appeal is whether it is necessary to give a second show cause notice against the punishment before the same was imposed on the respondent and to furnish him with a copy of the report of Inquiry Officer in view of the amendment of Cl. (2) of Art. 311 of the Constitution of India by the Constitution (Forty-Second Amendment) Act, 1976 and the consequential change brought about in Rule 15(4) of the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules. 1965 Indeed, the notice of the Special Leave Petition that was served on the respondent was confined only to the said question.

3. The respondent, K. S. Mahalingam. was the Examiner of Madras Customs House. While he was acting in that capacity, a charge sheet was served on him containing two articles of charge alleging misconduct involving lack of integrity and lack of devotion to duty












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top