SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(SC) 820

E.S.VENKATARAMIAH, KULDIP SINGH, M.FATHIMA BEEVI
Simhadri Satya Narayana Rao – Appellant
Versus
M. Budda Prasad – Respondent


Judgment

KULDIP SINGH, J.

(1) THE question for our consideration in this appeal is whether an election petition under the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (hereinafter called the Act) filed on the reopening of the High court after vacations, the period of forty-five days under Section 81 of the Act having run out during the vacations, was liable to be dismissed under Section 86 of the Act.

(2) THE elections to the A. P. Legislative Assembly were held on 22/11/1989. The appellant contested the assembly seat from Avinagoda constituency. He was declared elected on November 26, 1989. An election petition calling in question the appellants election could be presented to the A. P. High court within 45 days from the date of declaration of the election-result of the appellant. It is not disputed that the said period of forty-five days expired on 10/01/1990. The election petition, challenging the election of the appellant was, however, filed in the High court by the respondents on 15/01/1990.

(3) THE High court of A. P. remained closed for Sankranthi vacation from Tuesday, January 2nd to Friday, 12/01/1990 (both days inclusive). January 13 and 14, 19

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top