Based on the provided legal document, it is clear that the law recognizes the state as the trustee of all natural resources, including lakes, beels, rivers, forests, and other ecologically significant lands. The state has an affirmative duty to protect these resources in their natural state for the benefit of the public (!) . This duty includes ensuring that these resources are not diverted, encroached upon, or used in a manner that disrupts ecological balance or causes environmental degradation (!) .

Furthermore, even if leases or allotments have been previously granted for the use of such lands, these can be canceled or revoked if they are found to interfere with the ecological balance or violate the public trust. The law emphasizes that natural resources, being a gift of nature, should remain accessible for public use and enjoyment, and should not be privatized or exploited for private or commercial gains in a manner that harms the environment (!) . The prior approval or lease does not confer absolute rights that override the state’s responsibility to preserve ecological integrity; such leases can be annulled if they are in breach of the trust or cause environmental harm (!) .

In summary, the legal principles uphold that the state’s role as a trustee obligates it to protect natural resources from degradation. Any lease or allotment that compromises the ecological balance or results in environmental harm can be rescinded, and the resources must be restored to their natural state for the benefit of the public (!) (!) (!) .